2.5CS

Wobdog

a.k.a Mike
Site Donor $
Site Donor $$
Messages
766
Reaction score
800
Location
Los Altos Ca
I recently came across a photo that Ron Wakefield sent me a couple of years ago of his red 1975 BMW 2.5 CS parked in front of BMW headquarters in Munich. This was Ron’s second E9—his first was the one I now own. He told me he purchased the 2.5 CS while working for BMW in Germany. It was a stripped-down version built during the oil crisis as a more economical alternative to the 3.0 CS.
Only 874 examples of the BMW 2.5 CS (E9) were produced between 1974 and 1975:
  • 600 with manual transmission
  • 244 with automatic (2.5 CSA)

None were originally exported to the United States, which makes me wonder—has anyone here ever come across a restored example on U.S. soil?
 

Attachments

  • ron.jpg
    ron.jpg
    177.7 KB · Views: 43
I bought one here locally from a 78 yo lady who picked it up w her husband and drive around Europe in the 80s before bringing it back. I had Don put in a 3.5 and new suspension and brakes etc. coupeking did the interior. I still have some body work to do. But it’s a blast to drive. Chamonix. I put in a green interior. Love it.
 

Attachments

  • 20230615_183527.jpeg
    20230615_183527.jpeg
    487 KB · Views: 34
It was a stripped-down version built during the oil crisis as a more economical alternative to the 3.0 CS.
Other than the smaller displacement engine and steel wheels, how were the 2.5's stripped down? I assume that they came with manual windows and no A/C like earlier, European delivery models. Vinyl instead of leather interior perhaps?
 
E.g., fixed windows in the back like the CSL, no power steering (but different ratio of steering box as compared to CSLs).
No swaybar on rear axle; no bumper horns below rear bumper.
 
Last edited:
Here is what chat tells us

Tool Box & Trunk Area
  • The tool tray in the trunk lid of the 2.5CS was smaller and simpler — often missing some tools that were standard in higher-trim E9s.
  • The tool cover could be plain gray plastic instead of the nicer black vinyl with chrome trim seen on the 3.0CS/CSi.
  • Some cars even had no lid gas struts, just a prop rod, depending on market
Windows and Glass
  • Manual roll-up windows were standard — no power windows (which were common on 3.0CS and CSi).
  • The rear quarter windows were often fixed (non-pop-out), unlike the earlier 2800CS and 3.0CS which had opening vent windows.
  • Thinner glass was used in some examples to save weight.
Interior Trim
  • Simpler vinyl upholstery (often black or tan) instead of leather.
  • No wood veneer on dash or doors in some markets — or minimal wood trim.
  • No rear center armrest or luxury features.
  • No rear defroster standard (optional).
  • Simpler instrument cluster (no tachometer in early prototypes, though production cars did have it).
Mechanical / Under-the-Skin Differences
  • carburetors (twin Zeniths instead of Solex/Weber on 3.0CS).
  • Different final drive ratio (longer gearing for better economy).
  • Simplified exhaust system, single tailpipe.
  • No power steering standard in many markets.
  • Simpler braking system (smaller front rotors on some, but still discs front/rear).
  • Steel wheels with hubcaps — no alloys standard.
Exterior Details
  • Minimal chrome — some parts unplated or simplified.
  • Badging read “2.5CS” on the trunk instead of “3.0CS.”
  • Some came with black grille surrounds instead of bright chrome.
  • No front fog lamps standard (optional).
  • Occasionally no side markers on Euro models.
Weight and Feel
  • The 2.5CS weighed roughly 75–100 kg (165–220 lb) less than a 3.0CS.
  • Felt lighter on its feet but also less torquey.
  • Quieter but less luxurious overall — very much a “base model” E9 built during the oil crisis (1974–1975).
Production & Markets
  • Built only for European markets, primarily Germany, Switzerland, and the UK.
  • Roughly 874 units total — so they’re quite rare.
  • Almost none officially imported to the U.S.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top