Comparing rust treatment methods

rblongboarder

Well-Known Member
Messages
624
Reaction score
282
Location
Southern California
An E3 restoration on this site introduced me to something new.. an epoxy primer technique for rust prevention.

I thought it would be useful to compare rust prevention techniques:


Technique 1: Galvanization
I don't know exactly what year galvanization was introduced, but there are many classic cars which lack it: Mustangs, 240z, 2002, E3, E9... I seem to recall galvanization was introduced about 1975 or 1976... when the early E24's, E21's and E12's were introduced.

Steel is sandblasted and then dipped in molten zinc, producing a protective layer.


Technique 2: Chemical Dip.
This process is similar to re-chroming. Metal items are sandblasted, polished and de-greased. Sometimes there is a minor acid-etch step.

Finally the metal item is dipped in a chemical bath, which reacts with the steel, producing a thin layer that protects. Due to environmental regulations in California, Nevada and Arizona, a lot of this industry has transitioned to Utah.


Technique 3: Novol Epoxy Primer System.
I was not familiar with this technique until I started a discussion regarding this E3 restoration:

The process seems similar to chemical dip in terms of preparation.

My curiosity: how well does the epoxy bind to bare metal ? What happens when metal is dented?


Perhaps others on the site can contribute knowledge, and potential companies that do this sort of work in the USA.
 
Back
Top