LA: 1972 (1973?) 3.0 CS - $22,000

[Markos]

Looks pretty good. Needs a rear bumper and dash work. This looks like a '73 to me...

http://losangeles.craigslist.org/sfv/cto/5917828866.html

 

[teahead]

Will definitely need a closer inspection, but from the onset, looks alright.

Some serious serious heavy undercoating on this sucker. Probably a good thing I guess.

Is it me or something strange about the below photo???

 

[Markos]

Is it me or something strange about the below photo???

Agreed that is a lot of undercoating. Otherwise the stamping looks normal to me. The photo just cuts off the most recognizable parts...

Photo Credit: Dusty...

 

[andyleonard]

Is there something scary about this car? It seems attractive enough for the driver quality money - which is dropping - but the lack of interest would indicate it's a known car.

Comments please.

 

[floridabmx]

Agreed that is a lot of undercoating. Otherwise the stamping looks normal to me. The photo just cuts off the most recognizable parts...

Photo Credit: Dusty...

I think he meant a little farther back in view. is that a huge hole in the undercarriage?

Is there something scary about this car? It seems attractive enough for the driver quality money - which is dropping - but the lack of interest would indicate it's a known car.

Comments please.

I agree it does look like a pretty good car for the money. If that is a huge hole in the undercarriage I wouldnt be suprised. Even the 20k cars need metal work, atleast this one looks quite honest and straight.

 

[HB Chris]

That undercarriage shot is a different coupe, exhaust is brand new. The hole is just hanging undercoating to me.

 

[Markos]

That undercarriage shot is a different coupe, exhaust is brand new. The hole is just hanging undercoating to me.

The pic of the coupe with the new exhaust was for undercarriage illustration purposes only...

 

[HB Chris]

Ah, in that case never mind