pmansson
Well-Known Member
I have 2 cars with sensationally tight PS boxes. Almost like driving a well sorted E-type with their rack and pinion steering, as well as all modern cars of course.
I also have a CSL and two "CSL" cars (with manual steering boxes among other differences) which are equally tight, but on a third "CSL" car with a manual box the steering feels sloppy. I.e. too much play, or not the immediate reaction on the front wheels when the steering wheel is turned.
As a matter of fact the 2 cars with fantastic PS boxes, run on 14" stock wheels with XWX tyres, and the others on 16" wheels with their more modern low profile tyres.
I know that the manual CSL boxes must not be tightened too much using that top end screw. The boxes have been out for overhauls incl new seals.
It is not a question of sloppiness due to play in the tie rods with their delicate ends (which suffer more/last shorter with wider low profile tyres.
Has anyone made similar observations?
My conclusion is that the manual steering boxes are not tighter per definition, than the PS boxes, which I thought was the case.
I also have a CSL and two "CSL" cars (with manual steering boxes among other differences) which are equally tight, but on a third "CSL" car with a manual box the steering feels sloppy. I.e. too much play, or not the immediate reaction on the front wheels when the steering wheel is turned.
As a matter of fact the 2 cars with fantastic PS boxes, run on 14" stock wheels with XWX tyres, and the others on 16" wheels with their more modern low profile tyres.
I know that the manual CSL boxes must not be tightened too much using that top end screw. The boxes have been out for overhauls incl new seals.
It is not a question of sloppiness due to play in the tie rods with their delicate ends (which suffer more/last shorter with wider low profile tyres.
Has anyone made similar observations?
My conclusion is that the manual steering boxes are not tighter per definition, than the PS boxes, which I thought was the case.