I understand there will be a wide variance from car to car depending on previous ownership, restoration history, etc., but what can a novice owner of, let's say, a "good example" expect in terms of fun to drive (acceleration handling, etc.), dependability (how long of a trip would you take it on without worrying about a breakdown), what are the weak points (in addition to rust), etc.
Thanks in advance.
If it is a "good example" it should be completely sound, in terms of driving, so you could take it however far you wanted to go. All the mechanical parts are used in other, later cars, often with 300k+ miles on them without much work. (excluding the horrible auto trans, of course)
Most of the driving stats are in the Car & Driver period review, which is located in our technical archives section of the site.
The main weak spots would be:
Fuel mileage (should be in the low 20s on regular for a stock example, unless you are driving like a banshee)
Cooling system
radio (one in-dash speaker isn't exactly a quality listening experience)
AC (think wheezing mouse with a cough)
Electric windows (they will be slow, but should work)
Interior wood sections (de-laminate due to moisture)
Rust is, without a doubt, the biggest problem. If you can fix the rust, everything else is cake. The thing is, this car represented the upper-most crust of european design and manufacturing at the time, so it drives much like a modern car, as most of the primary component setup has been carried over, even today. It was 5 times the cost of a 2002 at the time.