Looks promising for the price point! I work nearby so perhaps I could check it out over lunch.
http://seattle.craigslist.org/see/cto/5482059704.html
http://seattle.craigslist.org/see/cto/5482059704.html
A 74 has black kidney slats, four each side, earlier cars had five each side. I've never seen such puffy front seat backs, reminds me of the Seinfeld puffy shirt episode!
So this is what Seattle cars are like?
In today's market he will get the asking price or close to it.
He has an offer on the car although he was unwilling to decide on any offer below the asking price. The owner was out of town at the moment and he was not willing to contact the owner unless it was a full price offer.
In the end, I was unable to bring myself to pay $24500 for the car.
There is rust. All towers and wheel wells look in good shape.
The under carriage of the car was sprayed with some type of coating at some point and it is obvious there is rust lurking. The paint is 10+ years old based on my conversation. Meaning the under carriage was likely sprayed over ten years ago.
Completely stock drive train; but looks to be in reasonable and good running condition.
The pan and rockers are shot.
The shop owner is very honest and in my opinion, not a salesman. I am confident he is just trying to help out a long term client sell the car for a reasonable price. I bet it is sold already or will be be sold in the next day or two.
A 'reasonable' price is an entirely subjective question.
Whoever buys the car for this price should not go through buyers remorse and just drive the car. Enjoy it! Just spend the $$$'s need to get rid of the sucky bumpers.
If the plan is to tear it down there may be betters deals for this kind of restoration.
It will still get the same of higher price in 5 years.
I was unable to post on the e9 forum, but did have a response to the thread posted there, not sure if you want to post it or not:
As someone who restores cars for a living I must say that I find the comments on this vehicle to be odd.
“I guess the owner of this car drove it in the rain” I would be beyond amazed to find any 42 year old car that had not been driven in the rain, and to my knowledge the present owner has never driven the car in the rain and it has been stored indoors for at least the past 10 years.
A link to a car on ebay which had identical floor pans which sold for $22 which had warped door cards, non-original air cleaners, and needed a complete repaint.
The $20 paint gauge I tried on a freshly painted 280SL with just over $35k in metal and paint work showed 1mm differences over a 4” section of the front fender where the backside could clearly be seen and felt and reflected no such variations. I guess you get what you pay for there. A side note, after wildly varying readings I tried to retest it this morning using several plastic thickness gauges and found that the battery was too low to take a measurement…
Something about puffy seats. Do a google image search for “BMW 3.0CS seats” and you will see that other than sacked out seats all the 3.0’s had these same seats. The comment seems quite nit-picking IMHO as someone who deals with vintage cars all day, every day.
Lastly I am a bit surprised by the comments regarding rockers on this thread. The vehicle is 42 years old and none of the rust is on a structural component. There is some rust in the rear of the drivers side rocker and two small areas on the forward floor pans, both small patch repairs at best. The rear rocker section is also a relatively small area and a patch repair. All the pieces are available to do these repairs and the rocker itself is covered by trim. I have seen far more extensive repairs performed on VW bugs and 911’s without a second thought. In face rocker panel and floor section replacement are a general assumption on any 911 under $40k.
The E9, and the CS in particular is the iconic BMW, they are listed in the 10 most beautiful cars of all time and really anyone should be proud to own such an icon of car design. Even being a Porsche guy myself, I have to say that the 3.0CS is a far les common and therefore more striking vehicle.
At this price point and rarity we are not discussing tarting up a Honda or slapping some fender flares on a Nissan here, we are, or should be, discussing owning and restoring a piece of automotive history. These are big boy toys and vehicles which are on the precipice of a value spike about to follow the early 911’s which in the past 5 years shot from the low 20’s to 120 and up. Frankly if I had the space to store another car, a 3.0CS would be on the list.
This car is a nice driver which presents well, it needs some minor rust repair, a rear seat recovering and some general piece by piece restoration, really it’s only downfall is that it was not originally a black car. That said, I would take a repaint over a brown car any day. My point is; Let’s not be petty or unrealistic, the car is fairly priced, from 1973 to 1975 they only made 393 of these cars for the US market, these vehicles are rarified air and those lucky enough to own one are lucky. Let’s not lower the standing of the enthusiasts for these beautiful cars with petty quips and pointless comments. Groups like this should embrace being charged with the stewardship of these classics
this might be a bargain in a couple of years- would it cost 25K to make her a 50K car.. the way prices are going? Just saying-