A future I gladly pass on.
It isn't obvious to this 70 year-old why a video of a zombie in the woods would motivate someone to buy a BMW, but then I'm not their target market. Seems weird to me, but hey, it's their money.
Why would people crave the "ultimate driving machine" in a world where nobody is driving?
In the "I have said this before" category... I am also very much looking forward to this brave new world. This is not an either/or proposition. You don't have to give up anything. (except perhaps driving in the middle of the big cities in Europe and Asia - which is not much fun anyway.) There are far more situations where driving is nothing but a necessary chore to get from A to B. Commuting to work being the best example. In that case I'd be much happier comfortably sitting in the back of a rented/shared self driving thing reading or snoozing. And then when I feel like going for a real drive for the pure enjoyment of it on a day off, I'll lift the garage door and say hello to my real car.I look forward to the tech. I spend 2-3 hours in Seattle traffic M-F. A self driving car would give me over 10 hours of additional forum surfing time.
I think ultimately, you self drivers won't be compatible with the pack of computer coordinated mobility devices. Money will decide which wins out.
It is hard for me to see where self-driving leads. A bunch of people travelling in individual self-driven cars on the same highway going the same direction seems oddly more inefficient or pointless vis-a-vis public transportation than the same amount of cars on the same route being driven by people. Don't know why I have that impression. Does it contribute to sprawl? Does it increase the number of cars on the road? Once disconnected from driving, do people decide they'd just as soon use public transportation? I wonder what land use and transportation planners are doing to anticipate?
I see self driving features as a luxury option. Kind of like being chauffeured; sure, anybody can drive themselves, but to be driven to your destination in one’s own car, have your car park itself and be summoned when needed is a true luxury that I would use for most of my transportation. As was mentioned, when I feel like it, I would turn off the computers and drive myself or step into the e9 time machine to remember what the dinosaurs were like.
Yes to the idiots. But please no to the self driving cars. They are only making the idiot drivers worse. My opinion. I guess driving will be a lost "art", like writing, spelling, sketching, and one day thinking. :eek:Self driving cars will be a reality once the computer tech is more intelligent than the idiots on the road now, so it shouldn't be long!
Yes to the idiots. But please no to the self driving cars. They are only making the idiot drivers worse. My opinion. I guess driving will be a lost "art", like writing, spelling, sketching, and one day thinking. :eek:
Or would you need a parking lot or "car storage area"? It could change the typology entirely, but not in a good way. Codes are generally in place to help protect the health, safety and welfare of the public (people). If there were a "self driving auto storage" container (let's not even call it a building), it could be shorter since no people are walking in there. Would we be able to eliminate human moving elements (elevators and stairs)? Fire protection - who cares if it burns down if there are no people in there... (I do, but just for argument sake). And then what about all that car cuing at 4:50 "pick-up" time. We might need more concrete rather than less...You wouldn't necessarily need an adjacent parking lot or garage.