Mechanical vs vacuum advance
For VWs and 2002s, the hot ticket was supposed to be the diz with only mechanical advance. These had no vacuum gizmo screwed onto the outside.
As I have been given to understand it, the mechanical-advance-only (diz 008 for VW, forget what the number is for coupes) gives a faster advance versus rpm, but does not have the same total advance. It is suited for the engines on whch it is the original equipment. Typically, those motors had higher compression ratios and could not well tolerate as much total idnition advance.
IIRC there are only two diz numbers for carburetted coupes. I have used both and can't tell the difference but then again I'm not a tuning freak.
That said, the best diz is one that isn't worn out, and your diz drive, all the way back to the crank sprocket, should be considered. Obviously, a perfect diz won't do as much for a motor with a tired cam chain, worn out tensioner rail, or worn diz drive gear.
There used to be diz rebuild kits but they may be NLA, I've not tried to source one. Maximilian, CNPR, Mesa?
You can check the wear in the total diz drive by installing a diz, static timing it to TDC, then running the engine at idle. Assuming the engine is running smoothly, the timing mark should not jump around when you shine a timing light on it. I've put my light on a new factory (2002) engine and it was steady as a rock, whereas most of us by now have "a bit" of variation in our timing.
BTW, a Crane, Allison or Pertronix won't make much (diddley-squat ?) improvement to the accuracy of your ignition timing if there's wear in the drive system. Cam chain and timing rail, both replaceable items, might oughta be checked.