Next, I get a letter from a firm of lawyers in London (Sheridans). They are lawyers for the Agency which took the images. My claim is derided, they claim I approved use and I am offered.............. a free jacket.
I am having fun now. I am not bothered about any money and an apology would have sufficed, from the agency, but the London lawyers got snotty.
Enter ChatGPT - my lawyer, but I am schooled in law myself.
I write back deriding their derision and calculate a counter offer. £100,000 in damages.....plus, a free jacket.
Various toings and froings in email but we eventually have a Zoom meeting.
They have New Evidence! Eek: what is it. Sworn written statements from the team who took the photos and gave them to the clothing company WP. WP Marketing Dircetor was on the call.
I pointed out that they might not be credible witnesses, a bit like turkeys voting against Thanksgiving or Christmas. This didn't go down well.
The WP Director says the person who admitted unauthorised use was very bad at English. I pointed out that she had read English at Bologna University (the oldest in the world so it appears) competed an MA in the same subject and lived and worked in the US for two years. This went down very badly too.
They got nasty about the probity of my claim so we agreed to end the meeting. The WP Director said that if I was ever in Bologna I should drop in for a coffee. To the unpleasant lawyers I was able to use my favourite Groucho Marx saying "I've had a lovely time, but this wasn't it".