D-Jet

Aussiecsi

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,148
Reaction score
349
Location
Perth, Western Australia
I recently noticed that the "banana" runners are stamped 2,3,4, 5 & 6 ( "one" is unstamped ). This suggests to me the number sequence is for installation placement , however, they all share the same BMW part number . Anyone know the rationale behind the sequential numbering of an identical part ?. Thanks, Simon
 
Hi Simon. First I've heard of this. Do the markings look factory? Not from a later tuning? Where are they placed - I'll go look at my car for comparison.
Paul
 
I recently noticed that the "banana" runners are stamped 2,3,4, 5 & 6 ( "one" is unstamped ). This suggests to me the number sequence is for installation placement , however, they all share the same BMW part number . Anyone know the rationale behind the sequential numbering of an identical part ?. Thanks, Simon

Not having any live examples in front of me . . . I will hazard a guess.

I do not believe that earlier runners bear "2 through 6" markings. I think the unfamiliar markings may have been for later injected M30 engines poised for attachment of assorted bracketery. Per pictures below on later models (e.g., E12) still using the same style intake manifold, runner sizes and shapes may have been similar, but there were differences, e.g., studded threads, even if subtle or seemingly unnecessary.

64019001_z.jpg
61420001_z.jpg


Note, for example, protrusions on runners 2,3 and 4 below

154891-500-0.jpg


Same here

3.jpg
 
Last edited:
I recently noticed that the "banana" runners are stamped 2,3,4, 5 & 6 ( "one" is unstamped ). This suggests to me the number sequence is for installation placement , however, they all share the same BMW part number . Anyone know the rationale behind the sequential numbering of an identical part ?. Thanks, Simon
Forgive me for asking but what is a banana runner?
But having just seen a new post I assume they are the inlet pipes?
 
Pic with stamp please.
I have at least 50 in the shop- don’t remember stamping.
 

Attachments

  • 814EFC9C-EE10-496F-8063-3499EA5B9880.jpeg
    814EFC9C-EE10-496F-8063-3499EA5B9880.jpeg
    322 KB · Views: 128
Nope- never seen one.
The stub manifolds are numbered 123 and 456
 
not knowing that they are identical , it seems to me logical to have them numbered if you were to dismount them ... ?
 
Back
Top