here in the USA the first car band to make ads with no cars was Infiniti in 1989. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Infiniti suffer from Jaguar’s fate it they don’t improve their products and brand loyalty.funny the first car brand to avoid showing an
here in the USA the first car band to make ads with no cars was Infiniti in 1989. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Infiniti suffer from Jaguar’s fate it they don’t improve their products and brand loyalty.funny the first car brand to avoid showing an
Fact. You are right. The forum is not the place for my personal opinions. I got a bit carried away with this, but this Jaguar Rebranding ad is a very controversial topic, globally...Just try to remember... we're talking about opinions here on a subject that may never come up again, so try to put that into perspective. This thread will pass. Don't let it ruin your day or affect how you interact with someone on the forum for years to come.
Dan
So in an advertising sense, they're getting global attention overnight. Good or bad, it's working.this Jaguar Rebranding ad is a very controversial topic, globally..
Jaguar's current CO stated that Jaguar's former customers make up only 15% of their current customers.To me, this is exactly the same thing at the Bud Light commercial.
I can understand how a marketing person could emphasize the need to be "relevant" or to appeal to a younger audience, and/or to improve sales of a new product that may differ in important ways from products previously offered. So they propose something that will garner attention and get people talking about your brand. (And lo and behold, we are talking about their brand).
What I can't understand is the approval process for these types of proposals. Assuming a valuable brand, somebody in charge needs to think about the existing brand, the history of what went into building the brand, and the customers who are loyal to the brand based on products previously sold under the brand name. The proposed advertising campaign needs to offer something new but in a way that is not inconsistent with the valuable brand. It should have occurred to the person or people in charge that this particular advertising campaign is likely to both insult and alienate their existing customer base and thus decrease the value of the existing brand.
That implies the brand was destroyed...they might as well call themselves ACME cars and use the roadrunner in their badges instead of the feline...Jaguar's current CO stated that Jaguar's former customers make up only 15% of their current customers.
That implies the brand was destroyed...they might as well call themselves ACME cars and use the roadrunner in their badges instead of the feline...
brilliant... but a bit creepy and probably not very " correct "
Brands do work for me. Last week I walked into the Apple store to finally upgrade my 4 year phone to iPhone 16. You cannot do that and be brand unaware, if Apple had 15% loyalty they would die. I am using the new phone and it only reinforces brand loyalty, superb product. They wanted to sell me insurance and I can tell them no thanks, I think their commercials cover product and fluff as well, but Apple is a cult and may not depend on advertising.Question: are there brands with successful products that make similar commercials? (without featuring the product, being overly "in your face")
What modern Jag is innovative? Cool? Technically wow? Styling worthy of the Louvre/MOMA?
Sir William Lyons must be rolling in his grave now when he sees what Jaguar's current marketing has to offer...I read once that William Lyons would have Jaguar prototypes parked under an oak tree at his country house outside his study window and take his time making styling decisions and approvals. Don't think that ad would have got up if he was still around.