To me, this is exactly the same thing at the Bud Light commercial.
I can understand how a marketing person could emphasize the need to be "relevant" or to appeal to a younger audience, and/or to improve sales of a new product that may differ in important ways from products previously offered. So they propose something that will garner attention and get people talking about your brand. (And lo and behold, we are talking about their brand).
What I can't understand is the approval process for these types of proposals. Assuming a valuable brand, somebody in charge needs to think about the existing brand, the history of what went into building the brand, and the customers who are loyal to the brand based on products previously sold under the brand name. The proposed advertising campaign needs to offer something new but in a way that is not inconsistent with the valuable brand. It should have occurred to the person or people in charge that this particular advertising campaign is likely to both insult and alienate their existing customer base and thus decrease the value of the existing brand.