I agree about the fantasy of zillions of manufacturing jobs..
There is nothing inherently wrong with a "service economy". In fact it is the lack of accounting for the service economy that seems to be driving the Admin anxiety about trade deficits.
A key flaw is that they are not accounting for all facets of the economy. If the US truly had a massive trade deficit, it would not be long before we all had no money, and some other country or countries had it. But that is not the case. The US is the richest country on the planet, and we are rich today because we sell lots of services to the world, and using the money the countries in the world pay us, we then buy washing machines from China and clothes from Vietnam... If you only look at manufactured goods and raw materials, in terms of trade, then you are missing a massive segment of the US economy.
I could go on about why I thin this admin is so infatuated with tariffs, but that's fodder for another post in another thread... Suffice it to say that a) there is nothing bad about a service economy, and b) it is unrealistic to imagine that bringing manufacturing back to the US would create any manufacturing jobs. All of it would be automated, and supported by that same service economy...