Sonny Crockett
Member
The horror...
I was asleep at the wheel. Thanks for the move Scott!guys since this is the 3rd thread (2 of which were posted in e9 discussion), i have merged all of them together and moved the original post to e9 discussion. great comments, just wanted to keep them together.
Actually, they are pretty much exactly the same...1. So it's interesting regarding the "hotrod rake" concept. I agree that something about the E39/E9 looks off - the lines between the door handle/stripe compared to the lower edge of the rocker panel look non-parallel, forming a trapezoid. Looking at the recent Malaga E9 that many of us thought was quite beautiful, it also has a fairly aggressive stance but that same line looks much more parallel and the whole car looks much more balanced. It's racy and ready to pounce while the E39 version looks too short and just off.
All interesting observations.I was trading ideas with one of the e9coupe members.. now that @ScottAndrews has posted a cool photo comparison, I'll post my observations...
A. On the E9/E39.. the black CSL stripe above the chromed body line is distracting to me.. almost visual overload. The E9's body has a beautiful complex curve in that area which provides a natural highlight to the paint. The CSL stripe hides this.. while the highlights are very visible in the Malaga (part of this is the lighting and professional photography)
B. I also note that the rocker panels are different colors, which can also distract the eye. Malaga has black rockers, while E9/E39 is polaris. To me, the chrome strip on the rocker defines the lower edge of the car, and the transition to black allows the underbody shapes to blend.
C. There is a significant difference in the lower front valence on the two cars as well.. their high above the road, and where their vertical edge lies relative to other details on the vehicle's nose.
D. On the E9/E39.. the rear section is painted black below the rear bumper... probably the last 2 to 3 inches... to my eye, the body line from the rockers does not transfer seamlessly across the rear tire and continue...
Yeah, I remember asking them about this, and they said that the wheel base from the donor chassis is slightly longer relative to the body panels. Hence the closer rear bumper to the fender edge. To reiterate, they told me it was $250K and two years to replicate if I wanted to buy one. I took a passThe rear quarter panels are shorter, see how close bumper ends come to the wheel well. And the tail panel below the bumper is huge and impacts the proportions.
How come nobody applauded @paul cain on his vocabulary..."testicular determination"...I admire the testicular determination to undertake this build. It's a staggering amount of design and fabrication. Given how different the two unibodies are, this is the most successful blending of the two that was possible. Somebody was really determined ($$$$$) joined with somebody that was very talented. For that I applaud them. This was my comment on the BaT auction on the specifics of how they carried it off:
@itsonlyCamrymoney "Image 234 is the most revealing – of the staggering amount of fabrication required to graft the narrow E9 body on to the wider E39 pan.
Also Image 239 shows how this magic was accomplished. Note the widened splice in the center of the E9 rear bumper. Everything above this ‘line’ is the original narrow E9 body, everything below is the wider E39 pan. This allowed them to retain the original E9 windscreen and backlight. Extremely difficult to visually carry off. Very elegant execution."
This car will sell for 43% of the cost of the original build.
I'd quibble that the correct adjective is "fortitude"...Testicles have no determination, they do the job guided by the "little head"...But they often do need fortitude...How come nobody applauded @paul cain on his vocabulary..."testicular determination"...![]()