So, I requested a brake booster check valve from Penske, a simple part that BMW used in the following US vehicles:
1502-2002tii (03/1966 — 07/1977)
3' E21 (02/1975 — 12/1983)
1500-2000CS (09/1963 — 01/1972)
5' E12 (02/1972 — 07/1981)
5' E28 (11/1980 — 12/1987)
2.5CS-3.0CSL (12/1968 — 11/1975)
6' E24 (10/1975 — 04/1989)
2500-3.3Li (08/1968 — 02/1977)
Z3 E36 (04/1996 — 06/2000)
Penskie tells me that BMW won't allow orders of this part in their system, and after waiting more than a week for BMW to decide whether to sell me one of these, I pulled the plug on my order.
Here is the email I sent to their parts manager:
Hi Lisa - I think they put you in a tough spot, and I want to work with you, but as a customer I just cannot let them push me around like this. I know this is a small dollar transaction to BMW, but I have been a BMW nut for thirteen years now, participating in the club and publishing in the magazine, etc. That said, I wonder if I am backing the wrong brand.
It is not expensive to provide us the parts we need to keep beautiful examples of the BMW heritage alive. It is less than a rounding error in their financial statements. (I am a CPA, and I know what I am saying here).
The BMW Classics North America representative I met in Pittsburgh in July told me BMW will never sell their parts designs. I understood this to mean they intended to continue to supply those of us who love their older cars with parts, which is great. On the other hand, if they want to protect the design without being bothered to actually supply us with the parts we require, we will feel justified in pirating parts because BMW won't supply them. I would prefer to respect BMW's rights in its designs, and I understand how this impacts pricing. In particular, I would pay for a BMW part if they would actually supply one. But they cannot leave owners who need parts dangling without an answer to the question "where do we get parts." This makes those of us who support the BMW brand feel like we are being taken for fools.
If we are not worth the trouble, why don't they just come out and tell us?
1502-2002tii (03/1966 — 07/1977)
3' E21 (02/1975 — 12/1983)
1500-2000CS (09/1963 — 01/1972)
5' E12 (02/1972 — 07/1981)
5' E28 (11/1980 — 12/1987)
2.5CS-3.0CSL (12/1968 — 11/1975)
6' E24 (10/1975 — 04/1989)
2500-3.3Li (08/1968 — 02/1977)
Z3 E36 (04/1996 — 06/2000)
Penskie tells me that BMW won't allow orders of this part in their system, and after waiting more than a week for BMW to decide whether to sell me one of these, I pulled the plug on my order.
Here is the email I sent to their parts manager:
Hi Lisa - I think they put you in a tough spot, and I want to work with you, but as a customer I just cannot let them push me around like this. I know this is a small dollar transaction to BMW, but I have been a BMW nut for thirteen years now, participating in the club and publishing in the magazine, etc. That said, I wonder if I am backing the wrong brand.
It is not expensive to provide us the parts we need to keep beautiful examples of the BMW heritage alive. It is less than a rounding error in their financial statements. (I am a CPA, and I know what I am saying here).
The BMW Classics North America representative I met in Pittsburgh in July told me BMW will never sell their parts designs. I understood this to mean they intended to continue to supply those of us who love their older cars with parts, which is great. On the other hand, if they want to protect the design without being bothered to actually supply us with the parts we require, we will feel justified in pirating parts because BMW won't supply them. I would prefer to respect BMW's rights in its designs, and I understand how this impacts pricing. In particular, I would pay for a BMW part if they would actually supply one. But they cannot leave owners who need parts dangling without an answer to the question "where do we get parts." This makes those of us who support the BMW brand feel like we are being taken for fools.
If we are not worth the trouble, why don't they just come out and tell us?