installing bilstein 24-008136 rear shocks on a e9 car

bimoverde

Well-Known Member
Site Donor
Messages
226
Reaction score
40
Location
california
I received the holstein front shocks 24-08136 that i ordered for my cs coupe. They seem to be about an inch shorter. Should i use the rubber mounts and brackets that come with it or should i replace the original upper rubber bushings that were with the original shocks and use those(they are available from Roger 's tii)?
Can someone comment on what is best. Since the shocks are shorter , when the car is lifted the upper bushings should be under more pressure..
 

HB Chris

Well-Known Member
Site Donor $$
Messages
19,418
Reaction score
8,759
Location
Huntington Beach, CA
Are you referring to the strut bearings? You don’t use the old foam absorber on the original shock.

Sounds like rear shock based on that part number.
 

bimoverde

Well-Known Member
Site Donor
Messages
226
Reaction score
40
Location
california
yes i am talking about the rear shocks. On the original shocks the upper rubber pushing is pressed on from the onside of the trunk...
 

HB Chris

Well-Known Member
Site Donor $$
Messages
19,418
Reaction score
8,759
Location
Huntington Beach, CA
Ah, your first sentence said front shocks. Carl Nelson advises using the e3/e12 cone shaped bushing with a large washer. Stevehose used this technique.
 

Attachments

  • 84BA9A4A-2DC5-4CB2-A39D-370723DF21D0.jpeg
    84BA9A4A-2DC5-4CB2-A39D-370723DF21D0.jpeg
    329.1 KB · Views: 274
  • CB2BDFD9-BDB2-4722-BF83-A1DA53A39221.jpeg
    CB2BDFD9-BDB2-4722-BF83-A1DA53A39221.jpeg
    369.5 KB · Views: 548

Stevehose

Well-Known Member
Site Donor $$
Messages
13,003
Reaction score
5,679
Location
Sarasota, FL
Yes, easy to install and supposedly braces the shock tower weakness. Doesn't matter that the shock is shorter, it will all equal out when on the ground, perhaps even a little higher than stock.
 

bimoverde

Well-Known Member
Site Donor
Messages
226
Reaction score
40
Location
california
sorry got confused here..thanks that is very helpful.. i will try with the new bushings i ordered from Roger's..they look very similar and use the big washers that come with the shocks..
can you forward me karl nelson posting/
 

HB Chris

Well-Known Member
Site Donor $$
Messages
19,418
Reaction score
8,759
Location
Huntington Beach, CA
It was not posted here, I spoke to him recently. Post a link to Roger’s for comparison.

Edit: found it
 

Attachments

  • D52A792E-F942-4A44-8FC4-0B480ED02126.jpeg
    D52A792E-F942-4A44-8FC4-0B480ED02126.jpeg
    20.8 KB · Views: 212

bimoverde

Well-Known Member
Site Donor
Messages
226
Reaction score
40
Location
california
do you have a reference number or a source for this bushings?.i probably should get them just in case.. not much fun taking theses things apart in the first place,..
 

HB Chris

Well-Known Member
Site Donor $$
Messages
19,418
Reaction score
8,759
Location
Huntington Beach, CA
Probably the same bushing, it’s a BMW part. Carl uses a large washer like I posted around the narrow waist to reinforce the shock turret in the fender, I bought two sizes at Ace Hardware but haven’t done this yet for a friend’s coupe. Remove the metal sleeve inside the bushing and then stick into the turret, makes it easier, then reinsert the metal sleeve.
 

bimoverde

Well-Known Member
Site Donor
Messages
226
Reaction score
40
Location
california
yes i did..used the correct rubber bushing a wagon top of the shock before fitting it under the fender and a washer under the nut(that is for the rear...
 

bavbob

Well-Known Member
Site Donor
Messages
3,372
Reaction score
1,585
Location
Boston, Ma
Copy of my old posting:
So how much for the rear rubber mounting for the Bilstein B6 ???

Dealer charge is 35 dollars or so, part does not come with the kit that comes with the Bilstein B6 rear shock for the E9.

I spoke to someone at Bilstein who was massively helpful. Kits for the 2002 that have the #11 rubber mounting we need, cannot be purchased separately in the USA...but a kit that comes with a Bilstein for a Dodge has the exact bushing we need (#10 in the Dodge kit is 25mm so cannot be used since we need 28mm).

Part number is E4B46276 and listed on Summit racing site for $3.88. Bilstein says that Summit should have it
(I have not tried to purchase, Bilstein was nice enough to send me two).

Just thought this would be good info for all of us.

diag_f0k.png
 

Luis A.

Well-Known Member
Site Donor
Messages
1,533
Reaction score
358
Location
Wisconsin
Ah, your first sentence said front shocks. Carl Nelson advises using the e3/e12 cone shaped bushing with a large washer. Stevehose used this technique.
cb2bdfd9-bdb2-4722-bf83-a1da53a39221-jpeg.58407

Chris or Steve, After reading several of these rear shock threads using the larger E3/E12 top tower rubber bushing w/ washer, I'd like to confirm that it gets placed with the smallest diameter part of the bushing facing up, thus placed from the bottom, inside, of the tower.

Correct?

I'll be soon getting under there to replace my Bilsteins with something without a gas charge to avoid what I feel is too strong of an expanding/rebound action of the spring/shock assembly. And I really like the idea of passive reinforcing by using the large washer to distribute the load.
 

Stevehose

Well-Known Member
Site Donor $$
Messages
13,003
Reaction score
5,679
Location
Sarasota, FL
Yes, and when you tighten it down, the washer expands the rubber out for a tight fit over the tower. Hope your towers are reinforced! :D
 

Bmachine

Well-Known Member
Site Donor $
Site Donor $$
Messages
3,534
Reaction score
1,792
Location
Northern California coast
@Stevehose and @Luis A. : In the thread below, you seem to indicate that you went along with what @Sven and @deQuincey were suggesting: Putting the wider end of the bushing at the top. Therefore installing the bushing from the top (inside the trunk) instead of from the bottom. Just like in the schematic above, part 11. Did you change your mind and do it the other way for some reason?


I have to say that when using that big Carl Nelson washer, it would make it a lot easier to slide it on the collar of the bushing first and then push the narrow end of the bushing with the washer already installed from the bottom. Instead of pushing the narrow end down from the top and then having to try and slip the big washer onto it from the bottom inside the shock tower.
 

Stevehose

Well-Known Member
Site Donor $$
Messages
13,003
Reaction score
5,679
Location
Sarasota, FL
@Stevehose and @Luis A. : In the thread below, you seem to indicate that you went along with what @Sven and @deQuincey were suggesting: Putting the wider end of the bushing at the top. Therefore installing the bushing from the top (inside the trunk) instead of from the bottom. Just like in the schematic above, part 11. Did you change your mind and do it the other way for some reason?


I have to say that when using that big Carl Nelson washer, it would make it a lot easier to slide it on the collar of the bushing first and then push the narrow end of the bushing with the washer already installed from the bottom. Instead of pushing the narrow end down from the top and then having to try and slip the big washer onto it from the bottom inside the shock tower.
Sorry, I don't remember what I ended up doing, my pea brain is drawing a blank o_O
 
Top