Mike Goble
Well-Known Member
I think you worry too much.
Demographics played a large part in DC’s transformation, but the catalyst was the stability and security of government investment; nobody was moving into those neighborhoods before the government made concrete commitments.Fascinating.
The Mission in SF turned around way faster than 15 years, and Dumbo in Brooklyn as well. Countless examples of that maybe because demographics drove the process. Government office space can make a neighborhood safer, unlikely to make it more lively...
No doubt. My point is that the trigger is investment, but not necessarily by government. In SF China Basin it was the massive UCSF buildup plus the Chase Center stadium perhaps. In Brooklyn it was all private sector I think, in the SF Mission it was the gentrification and the young commuters from the Silicon Valley. Manhattan, in my opinion, always had a dynamic where neighborhoods have a slow decay process (based on aging, neglect, and quality of life retreat) followed by a very rapid recovery triggered by values falling below a threshold that attracts private sector investment en masse. Fascinating to watch.Demographics played a large part in DC’s transformation, but the catalyst was the stability and security of government investment; nobody was moving into those neighborhoods before the government made concrete commitments.
Correct. And that will happen regardless of the companies legacy. I meant the transformation was positive in the sense that it can be real, not just rebranding...Ultimately these oil companies' value is in logistics, operations, investment, risk analysis, etc., for energy and transportation. People think they benefit from higher oil prices because they own the oil on the ground, they do not. The oil belongs to the sovereign country where the oil resides, and the largest reserves are Saudi, Iranian, Russian, Venezuelan. Not Chevron and Exxon. Alternate energy has the positive effect of the defanging, shall I say, problematic actors. The Saudis are clearly investing for a diversified energy future, the others have played a game where their malfeasance increases the risk premium of a barrel of oil, so global instability is a free lunch for them...Yes overall I think it is a good thing. Eventually people will be complaining about “big energy” eating up all of the pristine desert land with solar fields.
Correct. And that will happen regardless of the companies legacy. I meant the transformation was positive in the sense that it can be real, not just rebranding...Ultimately these oil companies' value is in logistics, operations, investment, risk analysis, etc., for energy and transportation. People think they benefit from higher oil prices because they own the oil on the ground, they do not. The oil belongs to the sovereign country where the oil resides, and the largest reserves are Saudi, Iranian, Russian, Venezuelan. Not Chevron and Exxon. Alternate energy has the positive effect of the defanging, shall I say, problematic actors. The Saudis are clearly investing for a diversified energy future, the others have played a game where their malfeasance increases the risk premium of a barrel of oil, so global instability is a free lunch for them...
Hi guys
I have a real worry in my mind .
If everyone moves away from internal combustion engines.
Will they eventually stop “making “ petrol.
Or will they scale production back so much that the cost per litre will be equivalent to a rare vintage bottle of whiskey or something .
I made a similar comment a while back and was reminded the US military has a lot of machinery that is ICE, and will continue to be ICE for a long time. For 'national security' I expect there will be a need for carbon based fuels far into the future. But we certainly don't want to be forced to pay outrageous amounts for our fuel which migh happen if the volume falls too much.Hi guys
I have a real worry in my mind .
If everyone moves away from internal combustion engines.
Will they eventually stop “making “ petrol.
Or will they scale production back so much that the cost per litre will be equivalent to a rare vintage bottle of whiskey or something .
And if that happens , how will we take out our classic cars ??
I know some people might say , get them converted to EV running gear, but honestly, to me that is not what classic cars are about, I don’t have any interest in rolling around in a no engined , rattling, wind noisy , re shelled Prius .
( I might be getting too carried away with that last point So no offence to anyone who already has a nice converted classic ! )
Even though gasoline use will decline, oil extraction isn’t going away. Think of the products made from oil that aren’t gasoline: jet fuel, diesel, asphalt, fuel oil for ships, plastic, clothes, tires, etc… It would be interesting to learn from a chemical engineer how they will reallocate much of the gasoline component from oil refineries.I made a similar comment a while back and was reminded the US military has a lot of machinery that is ICE, and will continue to be ICE for a long time. For 'national security' I expect there will be a need for carbon based fuels far into the future. But we certainly don't want to be forced to pay outrageous amounts for our fuel which migh happen if the volume falls too much.
Even though gasoline use will decline, oil extraction isn’t going away. Think of the products made from oil that aren’t gasoline: jet fuel, diesel, asphalt, fuel oil for ships, plastic, clothes, tires, etc… It would be interesting to learn from a chemical engineer how they will reallocate much of the gasoline component from oil refineries.
Yep, I used to visit Paris for work and my co-workers told me France needs no Hybrid cars as their Diesels could drive 1.000 km per tank.......
I rented a FIat Tipo Diesel wagon in Europe this summer--manual trans and got 48 mpg, had good torque, while hauling four of us around with a lot of gear. Drove it over the Stelvio Pass. It's a great ICE car. Too bad diesel has such a bad rap.
Volvo XC60 hybrid? 39mile all electric range.The RAV4 plug in goes 40 on a charge as does the Escape Hybrid, but those are too boring for me, and impossible to get.
"The energy density of gasoline will never equal that of oats. And I challenge you sir, to carry gasoline in the pockets of your trousers. You can't, but as you can see mine are full of oats. How will you ever get around the distribution problem? Make waterproof pockets? Can't be done."Volvo XC60 hybrid? 39mile all electric range.
ICE technology was still seeing major technology advancements 100 years after its introduction. It is rational to therefore conclude we will see big technology. advancements in BEV battery technology for many years. Those who poo-poo BEV’s today are the decendants of those that said passenger air travel would never be practical in 1920, that ICE cars would never catch on in 1890, and the wheel was impractical due to the lack of high performance axle grease.
Ya. Can’t get too excited about a Volvo SUV. Or any SUV.Volvo XC60 hybrid? 39mile all electric range.
ICE technology was still seeing major technology advancements 100 years after its introduction. It is rational to therefore conclude we will see big technology. advancements in BEV battery technology for many years. Those who poo-poo BEV’s today are the decendants of those that said passenger air travel would never be practical in 1920, that ICE cars would never catch on in 1890, and the wheel was impractical due to the lack of high performance axle grease.
The Road To An EV Battery Breakthrough
Startups to Tesla are pushing for small improvements to big breakthroughs.www.investors.com
Teslas don’t float! I had parked it outside due to the fire risk, and it did not move an inch. The battery pack is HEAVY. Every other ICE car and truck floats. There is a Toyota Tundra a few blocks away that floated at least ¼ a mile.Yep, I used to visit Paris for work and my co-workers told me France needs no Hybrid cars as their Diesels could drive 1.000 km per tank....
Can you be more graphic about the demise of your Tesla S 60?
a) did it float away to Havanna?
b) was it just flooded but still there when you came back? Was it towed by the insurer for scrap?
c) if it was insured, the insurance payment would finally settle the question of Tesla depreciation, though this question may be going too far . If so, ignore me.
Wow, that residual value is way better than ICE cars, even thought the battery was worn by now...Teslas don’t float! I had parked it outside due to the fire risk, and it did not move an inch. The battery pack is HEAVY. Every other ICE car and truck floats. There is a Toyota Tundra a few blocks away that floated at least ¼ a mile.
The fire department came and dragged it closer to the road to minimize fire risk to the structure. Then the insurance co came and got it. They paid it out without even looking at it. I just sent them a pic from my driveway. There was mud inside because when it got wet the drivers window rolled down.
The payment was about 45 percent of what it cost new in 2013. It had 130k miles. Pretty impressive.
You can still buy a model S--for 109k base price. But standard big battery, AWD, etc. Ours was RWD, smaller battery, was about 65k less 7500 tax credit., which is expired.Wow, that residual value is way better than ICE cars, even thought the battery was worn by now...
Isn’t it the case where if there was cost effective mass storage capability then utilization of those turbines (and solar) could go up closer to 100% (still dependent on wind and sunlight). This would enable utilities to time-shift the renewable energy to whwre it would be of most benefit.I never saw more than about 2/3 of the turbines 'turning'