Yes, I feel like ive advanced a rank in my wiring. Not a tenderfoot anymore, perhaps second class. Long way from Eagle.
With car wiring there really is no "Eagle"...These systems are typically so convoluted that you have to really tinker with them to fully understand what the designer was thinking. A good example is the alternator light, which is powered from both sides when the alternator is spinning, which means no current flows and the light goes out. If the alternator is not spinning, then the alternator coils provide a path to ground on one side of the lamp, so it lights up. WEIRD, but it works.Yes, I feel like ive advanced a rank in my wiring. Not a tenderfoot anymore, perhaps second class. Long way from Eagle.
I recently was given a Tesla Model Y by my son (he works for Tesla, and gave me his old one when he got a new one). On that car it seems like they went the complete opposite way. EVERYTHING is controlled by a computer. Even the adjustment of the air direction from the vents is done by moving the animated wind blowing on the touch screen using your finger. Here the wiring is simple (its all networked), but the software is complex, and it takes a while to figure out how to do simple things like tilt the mirrors, or adjust the air vents...
Completely agree - having owned quite a few electric vehicles (a few Teslas, currently Rivian) the controls for wipers, HVAC etc all really seem more optimal by physical controls. While the animation concept is neat, it's hard to achieve the equivalent of "I want the air blowing at the top of my head but not right into my eyes".
Yep!!. Having spent the last 30 years in the advanced automotive business, I have found one of the key complaints from users is having to sort out how to perform simple operations in the car. And in most cases when the car tries to second guess the user's intentions, it gets it wrong.I have a Tesla model S and recently had some rentals of a Mercedes and a BMW that we just drove across the country. In the cases of all three (less so the BMW), I find the use of electronic controls to be a case of a solution searching for a problem. The old style buttons are more intuitive and thus much easier to use.
Yeah, that whole thing is truly "inspired"... and the switch stalk is about the most complicated thing on the car!Totally second the e9 wiper “feature”. Given that this is still a relatively new car for me when I reconnected everything and powered up the electronics I was convinced I had wired something wrong because I couldn’t get the wipers to stop. Push/pull button has positions 1,2 and 3 which I assumed were 0, 1 and 2. Then luckily remembered the end of the wiper stalk push-in…
I thin my SF Don engine has the newer starter. I'll check it when I get back home from Austin, SundayI tried to put a clip or my multimeter on the 12:00 starter post but I can't see enough to get it in the proper spot. Has anyone else tried this so we can definitely say whether it is energized or a ground?
I ended up after several years with rewiring the stalks to the later model - now my turn signal sits on the left, and my wiper control sits on the right. I repurposed the wiper speed switch in the center console for the heater hose bypass.After spending time in the e9 I end up getting used to the turn signal on the right side of the steering column. When I transition to my daily driver I end up turning on the windshield wipers.
We are creatures of habit.
Interesting, were there major modifications needed, other than the wiring?I ended up after several years with rewiring the stalks to the later model - now my turn signal sits on the left, and my wiper control sits on the right. I repurposed the wiper speed switch in the center console for the heater hose bypass.
And the upside: the later style stalks are available new for reasonable cost. The early style are super-rare and super-expensive.
I would tend to say no;Interesting, were there major modifications needed, other than the wiring?