74 Restomod

Planning on doing the 5spd and LSD. I’ve tried just about every mod you can imagine to get the coupe dialed in: fresh suspension bits, lowering springs, beefier sway bars, and now coilovers; but haven’t hit on a combo that meets the mark for me. I feel the coupe should be a bit more nimble than it is. I know I’m chasing something that the coupe isn’t, but I still believe there is better to be had.
 
Limited slip with more power will make it more nimble, somewhat transformative. I went from an automatic to a 5 speed, limited slip, Suspension Techniques springs and sway bars in 1995. That was transformative.
 
I’m chasing something that the coupe isn’t, but I still believe there is better to be had.

As long as you accept that you are changing the basic nature of the car then everything is in the table, right?

Here are some random thoughts on how to make an E9 more nimble on a budget:

A steering box that works to spec is not the problem, IMHO. My vintage race car has a worm and roller box and I can put it 1” off an apex repeatedly. The play in this type of box goes away once the steering is loaded up.

To me, E9 steering doesn’t feel sloppy, just slow. So, I would start by changing the ratio of front/rear roll bar stiffness (more relative rear bar). Then try changing the front alignment a bit (a hair less toe in, make sure all the suspension bushings are fresh). Think about a 350mm steering wheel. Next, I would look into speeding up the steering ratio per BelgiumBarry’s mods to the steering arms (don’t go too far and cause bad bump steer).

If it doesn’t handle likes Lotus Elise yet, how about focusing on taking as much weight off the front as possible: a GRP hood & front bumper, alloy radiator, plus AC delete?

Me? I decided not to try making my E9 something it isn’t. So I went shopping for a 2002 or GTV (got the Alfa). It is light and tossable as anything from that same era save a Lotus Europa, Ginetta or VW 914. And when that’s not enough I have a 1000lbs sports racer that’s street legal ;-)

John
 
Further to John's comment, you can also reduce front end weight by relocating the battery. Trunk relocation is fairly common, and there is also a thread about using a pair of smaller 6v batteries wired in series underneath each of the rear seats to get the weight even lower in the car. (Be advised a pair of six volts batteries can be made to put out 12v by wiring them in series, but the amperage available is not increased when you do this. You therefore need to ensure each 6v battery has sufficient amperage for cold starting.)
 
Last edited:
As long as you accept that you are changing the basic nature of the car then everything is in the table, right?

Here are some random thoughts on how to make an E9 more nimble on a budget:

A steering box that works to spec is not the problem, IMHO. My vintage race car has a worm and roller box and I can put it 1” off an apex repeatedly. The play in this type of box goes away once the steering is loaded up.

To me, E9 steering doesn’t feel sloppy, just slow. So, I would start by changing the ratio of front/rear roll bar stiffness (more relative rear bar). Then try changing the front alignment a bit (a hair less toe in, make sure all the suspension bushings are fresh). Think about a 350mm steering wheel. Next, I would look into speeding up the steering ratio per BelgiumBarry’s mods to the steering arms (don’t go too far and cause bad bump steer).

If it doesn’t handle likes Lotus Elise yet, how about focusing on taking as much weight off the front as possible: a GRP hood & front bumper, alloy radiator, plus AC delete?

Me? I decided not to try making my E9 something it isn’t. So I went shopping for a 2002 or GTV (got the Alfa). It is light and tossable as anything from that same era save a Lotus Europa, Ginetta or VW 914. And when that’s not enough I have a 1000lbs sports racer that’s street legal ;-)

John

I’m with you on most of the mods. I am also really leaning towards lightening things up this time because I have tried most of the other things already. Again, I realize that the coupe won’t reach Lotus Elise level of handling but I’m still a little baffled as to how every Bavaria i have driven (3) has been more tossable and communicative than my most dialed in coupes.
 
Further to John's comment, you can also reduce front end weight by relocating the battery. Trunk relocation is fairly common, and there is also a thread about using a pair of smaller 6v batteries wired in parallel underneath each of the rear seats to get the weight even lower in the car. (Be advised a pair of six volts batteries can be made to put out 12v by wiring them in parallel, but the amperage available is not increased when you do this. You therefore need to ensure each 6v battery has sufficient amperage for cold starting.)

I’ve done the battery relocation to the trunk before but planned on putting it under the rear seat this time. more for keeping the trunk clear than for performance, but it may be an added bonus to have them that low.
 
I’m with you on most of the mods. I am also really leaning towards lightening things up this time because I have tried most of the other things already. Again, I realize that the coupe won’t reach Lotus Elise level of handling but I’m still a little baffled as to how every Bavaria i have driven (3) has been more tossable and communicative than my most dialed in coupes.

Bavaria’s have more weight in the back and are perhaps slightly better weight balanced?? They also had a better matched rear suspension. FWIW, I never felt any of my E3’s were more nimble than my E9’s. But there was a gap of 25 years between my last E3 and first E9. And neither model can compare with a well setup 2002.
John
 
I'd hazard a guess at saying an E3 is much more rigid structurally than an E9 owing to having a B pillar, similar to how vw used 5 door bodyshells for the mk2 Golf G60 limited as they were stiffer, that and a more effective rear suspension set up would make a factory E3 handle better than a factory e9
 
How about running a pair of small 12 volt AGMs in parallel?

Odyssey

I don't think this battery was around when I looked into this, but you need to look at whether the amperage of your battery setup is sufficient to start your car under a range of operating conditions. These batteries only have 150 cold cranking amps, so putting two of them together would get you to 300. Also, this battery references something called pulse cranking amperage. Not sure what that means, but you would need to understand that too. These amperage issues are a lot more important in colder climates.
 
Last edited:
Hey, just a quick note on the semantics here. Running batteries in "series" increases the voltage, but maintains the same amp-hour rating. Whereas, running batteries in "parallel" maintains the voltage but increases the amp-hour rating. If you have (2) 6v batteries, you'll want to run them in series to reach 12v. If you have two 12v batteries, you'll want to run them in parallel to maintain 12v.
 
Hey, just a quick note on the semantics here. Running batteries in "series" increases the voltage, but maintains the same amp-hour rating. Whereas, running batteries in "parallel" maintains the voltage but increases the amp-hour rating. If you have (2) 6v batteries, you'll want to run them in series to reach 12v. If you have two 12v batteries, you'll want to run them in parallel to maintain 12v.

Thanks Stephen - I've updated my posts to correct this.
 
In looking at my diff, I came across some writing in chalk that I can’t decipher. Can anyone decode this? Did I get lucky...is this diff limited slip?
 

Attachments

  • 7B09B206-D6B8-4ED3-A342-27C35D09F0A9.jpeg
    7B09B206-D6B8-4ED3-A342-27C35D09F0A9.jpeg
    287.1 KB · Views: 164
It can be painted but stamped is very common.

Ok, I checked again and found no stamp. However, upon closer inspection of the white, chalky script that I photographed, there is a faint “S” on its side, just underneath it! Can anyone else make it out, or is this just wishful thinking?
 
Back
Top