Prior sale $98,500
68k RNM...wow thats gotta be an all time record low for a csl
auction comment by “propellerhead-tom”
Quote
“RHD CSLs are less desirable because they were mostly spec’ed as City Pack cars and had more
in common with a CSi than a Batmobile or a 1st generation Lightweight.”
Unquote
= as it seems I am not alone after all…..![]()
@Wes - “miss the good old days….. “?? when ,more’ CSL owners were still on here and participated ??So you're hanging your argument on some twat making a comment on BATHow I miss the good old days when people would reference Wikipedia like it carried some weight.
Jokes aside, that comment is fundamentally incorrect, and has been repeatedly proven so on here.
From jealous CSi owners sooo wishing they had a CSL. LOLbut I received a lot of supporting emails
I think in the vintage muscle car world tgis would be refereed to as an "imposter" Pontiac made a Sprint that had all the cosmetics of the GTO but not the performance. Road & Track called it the "Imposter" which is appropriate for a CSL clone. Its not offensive; but its not the real thing no matter how hard you try.From jealous CSi owners sooo wishing they had a CSL. LOL
You cannot make a CSL into a CSi or a CSi into a CSL and that's negating the VIN #. It's that small detail called the body shell. It's thin on a CSL and ain't on a CSi. No matter what amount of money you spend, all you can do is bolt stuff on or take stuff off but you'll not ever transform one into the other.
From jealous CSi owners sooo wishing they had a CSL. LOL
You cannot make a CSL into a CSi or a CSi into a CSL and that's negating the VIN #. It's that small detail called the body shell. It's thin on a CSL and ain't on a CSi. No matter what amount of money you spend, all you can do is bolt stuff on or take stuff off but you'll not ever transform one into the other.
I think in the vintage muscle car world tgis would be refereed to as an "imposter" Pontiac made a Sprint that had all the cosmetics of the GTO but not the performance. Road & Track called it the "Imposter" which is appropriate for a CSL clone. Its not offensive; but its not the real thing no matter how hard you try.
I’m not so sure if I like you anymore.There is a difference though. Firstly, the RHD CSL had the same HP motor. Secondly, the process that made CSL production specialized and slow applies equally to the RHD CSL. If BMW needed to pump out 1,000 CSL’s fast, they could have used standard gauge metal on the RHD cars and slapped a CSL badge/VIN on them.
The “fact” (we like facts) is that the RHD CSL wasn’t a poverty-spec CSL. If would have cost BMW more money and time to outfit a RHD CSL. If the UK market wanted the luxury-free performance, the lightweights would have been a better faster option for BMW.
We need to really pivot this argument into why the UK market didn’t appreciate raw performance in the 70’s. They really ruined it for 20th century CSL enthusiasts.
This argument is tired. Why is it that when a hand-built US spec E28 M5 goes up for sale, we see accolades. We don’t see trolls coming out of the wood work to crap on the shadow line diving board bumpers, and nearly 30hp drop in power compared to the euro M5’s. I *think it is because less than 2,300 produced, the car is deemed rare and special regardless of the market-specific factory specifications. True enthusiasts respect the vehicle in all forms, and don’t use every FS listing to air their grievances.
I’m not so sure if I like you anymore.
This is a well traveled road in the aircooled 911 world. There areI think in the vintage muscle car world tgis would be refereed to as an "imposter" Pontiac made a Sprint that had all the cosmetics of the GTO but not the performance. Road & Track called it the "Imposter" which is appropriate for a CSL clone. Its not offensive; but its not the real thing no matter how hard you try.