Never forget the Canepa Conundrum..... California law states that a car that can not be registered in California must leave California.
My comment today on BAT:
Hello samboss- What you say and I will quote you is certainly completely different from what the California Department of Vehicles says and I will quote them.
samboss:
“the registration process for California is simple without any further steps necessary. ”
California DMV:
“California does not recommend the purchase or importation of these years of NON-USA vehicles, even if currently registered in another state. These vehicles require compliance with USEPA requirements in effect on the specific date of 11/15/1972. This provision when written, was considered by the California legislature as a gradual phase-out of very dirty “non-collectable” types of imports, as this specific requirement was understood to become increasingly difficult to meet. Today, this requirement, while not impossible to meet, would require testing expenses and modifications that far exceed most vehicles value and would make little sense from a collectors standpoint to attempt.
Some limited exemptions apply to individuals moving to California with vehicles of these years registered in their home state for at least a year before moving to California.”
I think it’s time to ask the simple question- Have you personally registered a gray market car in California that was not in your name when you brought it into California?
For California residents that are required to self report any legal or financial disputes/issues as a condition of holding a licence (Legal or Financial professions come to mind) the idea of having a Montana license plate and getting accused of tax evasion is unacceptable.
Suggest you check out the California DMV web page for out of state registration violators. California wants their money.
https://www.chp.ca.gov/Notify-CHP/chp-reg-(Out-of-State-Registration-Violators)#chpregForm
It’s a lovely car – GLWTA
This comment's likes: 0