Okay, so I tried to do my part to populate the registry with another coupe for which I have full documentation (but don't own). I didn't want to fill out the email address and user name as "the owner" because I am not in fact the owner.
Spent about 20 minutes sifting through records, populating fields, posting images (including VIN plate), only to have the entire record erased when I finished (b/c I did not fill in the three required fields).
I'm definately NOT complaining, I just want to do my part to help populate the registry and I hit a brick wall. It may be a good idea to seal the registry off to only those who own these cars (for privacy) or spam-bots. However, there will always be coupe-owners who don't particpate in this registry for whatever reason. If we (members) have reasonable knowlege, there should be a way we can enter information as non-owners, right? maybe the record has an asterick indicating that only some information is known, or the record is published without owner's consent.
After the initial surge of new records that populate the registry over the next few weeks/months, maybe a senior membership committee can be in charge of reviewing submissions by non-owners, or second parties? THat way, no bogus or erroneous entries make it in and pollute the records. Four or five semi-knowlegable members could be involved via email and publish the data, or archive it if it is insufficient or sketchy.
As I mentioned in an earlier post, I have three or four solid records sets to coupes I have either inspected, driven or inquired about.
Bottom line is that we'd be better off with less records if opening the floodgates would compromise the integrity, but if we can trust the sources and put some things through committee, maybe we'd really expand the coverage.