Some bits to improve,…
I appreciate your math Steve, for sure you are right, but my experience has been that using 0,25 at the cam, the resulting gap at the valve is something between 0,25 and 0,30, because the 0,30 feeler gauge can not go through that gapIf you put a .25 feeler gauge between the cam and the rocker, the resulting gap at the valve and rocker would be .315 (.25 x 1.26) and thus out of spec? A .2 gauge at the cam would give you .25 at the valve which is right between the range.
I appreciate your math Steve, for sure you are right, but my experience has been that using 0,25 at the cam, the resulting gap at the valve is something between 0,25 and 0,30, because the 0,30 feeler gauge can not go through that gap
what is the last consensus about the best valve gap ?If you put a .25 feeler gauge between the cam and the rocker, the resulting gap at the valve and rocker would be .315 (.25 x 1.26) and thus out of spec? A .2 gauge at the cam would give you .25 at the valve which is right between the range.
The gap spec in inches is .010" - .012" and I have always aimed for .010" to minimize but not eliminate valve noise (no noise = too tight). Plus I figure the gap will wear larger over time. Also to consider is supposedly larger gap improves idle quality but hinders high rpm
If you put a .25 feeler gauge between the cam and the rocker, the resulting gap at the valve and rocker would be .315 (.25 x 1.26) and thus out of spec? A .2 gauge at the cam would give you .25 at the valve which is right between the range.