see below, ALL CAPS response, not yelling
YES, I CAN. THE CHECKLIST MAY APPEAR LONG, BUT EVERYTHING ON IT WAS WITHIN SCOPE, WITH MAYBE A MINOR EXCEPTION. JUST BECAUSE THERE ARE LOTS OF WORDS, DOESN'T MEAN IT WAS OUT OF SCOPE OR WOULD TAKE LONG TO DO. PLEASE POINT ME TO ITEMS SPECIFICALLY THAT YOU FEEL WOULD TAKE LONG AND/OR WERE OUT OF SCOPE.
Alot of things weren’t within scope from the starting point, paintjob turned mini-resto, and I know that it isn’t your fault that they accepted to deal with your scope creep.
It’s obvious they did bite off more than they can chew, for one reason or the other.
I DISAGREE ENTIRELY. MY ISSUE HAS LITTLE TO DO WITH E9 SPECIFIC THINGS BUT RATHER GETTING A CAR BACK WITH DIRT? UNDER PAINT THAT SHOULD NOT BE THERE OR THAT WAS NOT FULLY BUFFED/CUT. YES, THERE WERE SOME ISOLATED E9 ISSUES, BUT FOR THE MOST PART THE ISSUE IS SIMPLY DELIVERING A CAR BACK TO A CUSTOMER THAT WASN'T DONE AND ASKING THE CUSTOMER TO POINT OUT FLAWS.
Yes, I don’t either understand why they let the coupe into your hands in its current state, the faults are many and obvious, and it should not have left the shop like that.
AGAIN, BE SPECIFIC. WHAT SHOULD I PAY HIM FOR THAT WASN'T COMTEMPLATED. THIS IS A SERIOUS QUESTION. ANY TIME BENNY ASKED FOR MORE MONEY, WHICH HE DID OFTEN AS SCOPE INCREASED, WITHOUT ARGUMENT OR NEGOTIATION I PAID HIM. IN FACT, I EVEN OFFER TO PAY HIM MUCH MORE TO COMPLETE THE BUMPER MODIFICATIONS EVEN THOUGH THAT WAS PART OF THE ORIG SCOPE, BUT I THOUGHT IT WOULD BE NICE TO DO.
What I’m saying is, the car isn’t really finished, so why wouldn’t you have to keep paying them to finish it? (Except the paint issues) Haven’t you been paying them by the hours they put in on the extras so far?
Maybe they thought you wanted it done cheap and fast, (despite you telling them to do it properly) since the quality is missing. If you demand high quality, you usually have to pay for it too, in both time and money.
THERE ARE MANY CLEAR PARTICLES OF DIRT/DUST THROUGHOUT. I AM CERTAIN THAT YOU WOULD NOT EXPECT THAT. MY CAR DIDN'T HAVE THESE TO BEGIN WITH. WOULD YOU LIKE HI-RES IMAGES WHERE YOU CAN CLEARLY SEE THEM? THE MINOR ONES I AM CERTAIN WILL COME OUT READILY WITH BUFF/CUT THAT HASN'T OCCURRED YET PROPERLY PER BENNY FOR REASONS I AM NOT SURE OF.
It took a good while for you to find any of these ”obvious” imperfections, or wasn’t it even so that it was your friend who found them? That tells me that they can’t be extremely obvious and that you wouldn’t notice them from several feets away if you didn’t know they existed.
So, where do you draw the line between a driver quality paint and a show paint?
It feels like you and Benny have different opinions on what’s acceptable for a drivers quality paint, and it’s a bit late to fix it in a good way at this moment. But he has promised to fix the most of it, so we’ll still have to wait and see what the end finish will be.
PLEASE IDENTIFY PRECISELY WHAT THINGS IN PARTICULAR REQUIRE "COUPE" EXPERIENCE TO FIX THAT HE IS INCAPABLE OF FIXING. WHENEVER I ASKED BENNY ABOUT HIS COMFORT LEVEL WORKING ON THIS CAR, HE WOULD POINT TO THE MULTIPLE CARS AROUND ME AND REMIND ME OF THE PORSCHE 356's HAS DONE, ETC. THAT I HAVE SEEN AND TELL ME IT'S NOT ROCKET SCIENCE.
The quality would certainly go up several notches if somebody who knew these cars were working on it, I can’t understand how you don’t see that.
It’s not rocket sience for sure, but it isn’t easy to get everything both looking and functioning right, either. Markos wrote a great post earlier in this thread about this, but if you don’t want to understand, you won’t understand.
Just take a look at Andrews thread, and what VSR did to his car, he’s now driving across the country and winning award after award. It’s no coincidence, it’s what you get when experienced people work on your car.
I DON'T HAVE SOLID PROOF BUT SUSPICIONS BASED UPON HIS COMMENTS ABOUT MY EGO AND BEING BOTHERED THAT I DON'T USE MY HANDS TO DO STUFF MYSELF AND INSTEAD HIRE SOMEONE TO DO THINGS FOR ME WHEN I CAN DO SO. I MAY BE WRONG, BUT I WILL ULTIMATELY FIND OUT AS I AM CERTAIN BENNY AND I ULTIMATELY WILL HAVE A BIG LAUGH OVER ALL THIS EVENTUALLY OVER A BEER WHEN I DO A VIDEO FOR HIM SHOWING JUST HOW GREAT A JOB HE DID AND HOW HAPPY I AM, WHICH I FULLY INTEND ON DOING WHEN ALL IS SAID AND DONE. THEN HE WILL TELL ME WHO SENT HIM THAT VIDEO WITH THE GOAL OF JUST STIRRING THINGS UP. IF IT WASN'T
@restart, THEN I WILL APOLOGIZE TO HIM AND EXPOSE THE PERSON IT WAS. BENNY WILL ULTIMATELY TELL ME. I AM SURE OF THAT.
So why name him as guilty before you really know? Wouldn’t the proper way be to just keep your suspicions to yourself _until_ you know?
If somebody suspects you of something, would you prefer them to openly put your name out, with a promise to say ”sorry” if they were wrong?
Come on, Scott.
Take your responsibility for uploading the video here, it’s ultimately your own fault no matter who sent them the video. Having an open and public project like this, with lots of videos does have its pros and cons, so you have to take the good with the bad, and remind yourself that without this forum you’d still be searching for parts, and not anywhere finished since both you and the shop lacks the know-how of these cars.