So I have been doing some measuring on my coupe, and exploring various options for intake manifolds using triple Weber 40 DCOE carbs.
The core issue with these, as most of you are aware, is interference with the brake booster. I am not super keen on having intake trumpets that almost interfere with the booster and the inner fender, and that are somewhat problematic relative to any sort of air filter.
My journey started when I bought a set of conversion manifolds from Pierce Manifolds. After measuring these, it appears they are about 18 degrees. They seems to be the same as those available from others (all made by Karsuntpartz), and I must say, they are really not very well finished.
I went over to the shop and set up a laser level to provide a datum in the engine bay. In this case I used the top of the firewall, which, while it may not appear so, sits even with the fender flange at the hood, right about where the shock tower is. Measuring down from there, I came up with a rough cross-section of the engine at cylinder 6 (the aft most one). The engine tilts up from there, rising about 31 mm from there at the front.
I then took dimensions from one of Tim Mason's beautiful billet air filters, and some rough measurements form the carbs, and tried various options and positions.
Using the 18 degree manifolds does not seem like a great idea. First off, since the engine sits at 30 degrees from vertical, the carbs are tilted 12 degrees back. While the carbs can tolerate some tilt, this is pretty extreme, and is outside the 5 degree limits that
@Stevehose suggested. I can make it work with custom 78 degree elbows leading up to the air filter, and just miss the standard brake booster, but this approach seems to have a lot of compromises.
I then tried a 25 degree manifold. This places the carbs at a 5 degree tilt toward the engine (better). This also works using elbow trumpets and a standard booster.
It is pretty obvious that the critical points are: 1) the clearance to the under side of the hood, 2) the clearance between the air filter and the carbs, and 3) the clearance to the brake booster. This last one is very tricky because, since the booster is round the clearance is affected by both the vertical rise of the assembly, and the later al extent.
Some observations: The lower the angle of the intake manifold, the greater the tilt of the carbs (obvious), and the greater the vertical clearance (because the assembly is not rising up as fast), but the lower the angle the more the entire assembly moves laterally (because it is not rising up as much as it is moving sideways). So, there is a complex non-linear relationship between the manifold angle and the three clearance points (hood, carbs and booster).
I also found that there are some 90 degree trumpets made by Kooglewerks, which seems much cheaper than making special 78 or 85 degree trumpets. Those seem to really only work with a 30 degree manifold unless you are OK having the air filter tilted sideways.
I finally caved in and tried a design using the 90 degree elbows, a 30 degree manifold, and a Tii booster. That seems to be the best solution. The beauty this approach is not only do the carbs sit flat, but there's relatively little vertical rise, so the vertical clearance is easier to manage, and the 90 degree elbows work. I will still need to account for the fact that the front of the engine is about 30 mm higher than the back (it rises by about 6 mm per cylinder), so to keep the front of the filter from hitting the underside of the hood, I'll need a tad more vertical clearance.
I think once I get the dimensions nailed down more precisely, I'll make up a solid model, 3D print a prototype for fit testing, and start looking at casting my own manifolds...
Here are some diagrams representing these three options. There is a bit more to do in terms of precision measurements, but I think I am homing in on an optimal solution.